Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove wait for disk call and add retry for busy error code #278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

eljohnson92
Copy link
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR removes the WaitForInstanceDiskStatus polling call and instead will re-queue any call and suppress any errors if the Linode API response is Linode Busy(400 response code).
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • adds or updates e2e tests

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.42%. Comparing base (9ca7c9d) to head (1109cbd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #278      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.83%   54.42%   +0.59%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        1566     1560       -6     
==========================================
+ Hits          843      849       +6     
+ Misses        673      663      -10     
+ Partials       50       48       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@eljohnson92 eljohnson92 merged commit d833668 into main Apr 23, 2024
8 checks passed
@AshleyDumaine AshleyDumaine deleted the remove_wait_for_disks branch May 6, 2024 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants